
Published in The Spectator 8th July 2011:
It should have been such a treat those of us who love a good epic tale: a head-to-head between the Arthurian legend cycle and a great modern myth-in-the-making. On the surface of things, Channel 4’s Camelot should have had the edge over Sky Atlantic’s Game of Thrones: stellar cast, time-honoured story, prime-time terrestrial TV slot.
At first sight they both looked handsome with their gorgeous locations, lovingly detailed costumes and castles, a touch of the other-worldly, eye-catching actors in various states of undress. But oh, what a difference in terms of script and dialogue…
It came as no surprise to me that HBO’s Game of Thrones (Sky Atlantic) should win hands down. As his UK publisher, I’ve been watching George RR Martin’s epic A Song of Ice and Fire cycle (of which A Game of Thrones is the first part) blazing a trail towards classic status for the past 15 years, perfect for the lavish HBO (Rome, Sopranos, True Blood) treatment. But I believe the real difference comes down to the nature of this particular series.
Epics like Camelot, Troy and Alexander all fall down horribly on their tin-ear dialogue and sheer implausibility of the characters. Characters in classical epics are symbolic, larger-than-life beings, more than human. Try to cut them down to size by making them psychologically believable, or worse, ‘relevant’ to a modern audience and you’ll make them sound ridiculous. Add fist-bitingly dreadful dialogue and you’ll have us laughing out loud.
‘Whoever pulls the sword from that stone will unite the land,’ Merlin tells Arthur in Camelot. ‘No waaay,’ replies Arthur, as if someone had just told him to go and do with his homework.
Or the usually excellent James Purefoy channelling Brian Blessed as he blasts into the throne room complaining that he’s ‘bloody starving’: ‘I’m King Lot and I haven’t had any dinner!’
It must have been a relief for both Sean Pertwee (Ector) and Purefoy when their respective characters killed one another off in the first episode.
The characters in Game of Thrones have been crafted by a man raised in the age of film, who has indeed spent much of his career as a screenwriter. As you read George RR Martin’s books, the scenes unspool before you like movies. His characters sound and behave like real people. As a result David Benioff and DB Weiss, the scriptwriters on Game of Thrones, have a far easier time of it (making up for the black marks against Benioff’s name after the dreadful Troy, which even Sean Bean’s sly Odysseus could not save).
In the moral universe of A Song of Ice and Fire the compass points are always equivocal: there’s no clear distinction between ‘good’ or ‘evil’. No godlike heroes or stage villains here. Martin’s characters are fully human in their desires and fears, their greed, ambition and fallibility; their occasional shining moments of decency and heroism, all the grubby, glorious contradictions of life. Tyrion Lannister, his main point-of-view character, is a dwarf with a wicked line in wit and a boundless appetite for wine and whores. But he’s also emotionally intelligent, and a book-lover. Likewise, his brother Jaime, a handsome, arrogant man who has cheerfully committed both regicide and incest, develops over the course of the novels into an altogether more sympathetic and likable chap.
Major characters in this series have long and surprising roads to travel or shocking demises in store (just as in life, being beloved won’t save you, as George swings his author’s scythe!) and that is also one of the delights for newcomers to A Song of Ice and Fire: unlike those grand epics on which we’ve been raised, you just don’t know what will happen next. Game of Thrones is only a taster for the massive epic narrative still to come. If you simply can’t wait for the next series (A Clash of Kings will screen in April 2012), you can read the novel, and then carry on with A Storm of Swords and A Feast for Crows. The long-awaited (6 years!) fifth instalment – A Dance with Dragons – is published on July 12th. As one of a very privileged few to have read it, I can promise you you’re in for another ecstatic, gritty, grimy, transcendently glorious treat.